Feedback for determining Sanction price

[james henderson]

I would vote for level, as this would give a set price, and would make it a bit more fair for the puss....I mean, the less developed players.
Also would eliminate extravagant fees for those who never leave their keyboards

hoi, it's a war game, where does FAIR Come into it?

[§Akatsuki§Kisame§]

hoi, it's a war game, where does FAIR Come into it?

Why are you quoting this gentlemen as saying fair? It appears that it is the developers of Warzone : Armageddon who want the game to be fair. Jim

[Flerrie Vicencio]

of course , bounty price should be based on income ,just sayin'

[RONIN]

hoi, it's a war game, where does FAIR Come into it?

James, Perhaps I should clarify..I would vote for level, with all other factors unchanged. If Joel gets his changes, then not.
I do agree with Joel(!) on the damage issue, The imperative function of sanctions must be punishment,period. There should be absolutely no benefit whatsoever, or there will be abuses.
If a 'flat-rate' system is not used, Then a horrifically detrimental set-up with units lost,or looted, cash stolen,health gone and maybe even xp lost.
If the system is set properly, no one will WANT to be sanctioned.
As it should be.....
I also think we should be able to kill allies, and claim own sanctions.