Printable View
Greetings everyone,
In our efforts to make the game more fluid while keeping imbalance and exploits at bay, we intend to further improve the sanctioning mechanics. With this, we are asking for your input as to how Sanction price should be determined: should it be fixed based on level, army capacity, ranking or any other idea?
Leave us your feedback here!
Thank you.
I would vote for level, as this would give a set price, and would make it a bit more fair for the puss....I mean, the less developed players.
Also would eliminate extravagant fees for those who never leave their keyboards
hoi, it's a war game, where does FAIR Come into it?Quote:
Originally Posted by RONIN
I like the sound of it being based apon your army capacity. That's what the game is about. Money should be there ultimately to make you tough, not pretty. . .or rich, or whatever. . you can go get rich on Farmville if your army on Warzone aint up to par . . Hazzaa
Why are you quoting this gentlemen as saying fair? It appears that it is the developers of Warzone : Armageddon who want the game to be fair. JimQuote:
Originally Posted by james henderson
alex if you want sanctions to work in this game then there is a lot to do ,
you must know by now there are more minis then real players in this game,
why you think they all have 1 or more = to sanction but you put a time delay so bye bye sanctions
, other thing why sanction a player? , you not hurth him he only lost some battles , no exp , no money , no weapons, you not punish him if you sanction him,, so why waste your money?
also the limit you can sanction a player is not a good idea , some players diserve to die 20 times day
myself included lol ,
also why we can not claim our own bounty? i promise you if i can do this i will sanction a lot players and try to have my money back lol ,
al last upgrades in warzone where superb
happy you understand it time sanctions works to ,
have fun all
I would definitely vote for a sanction price based on player worth and not level.
Basing it on level would mean making the sanction price for the 2 players on the same level equal even if one is worth $1B and the other $1M !!!! I find this very stupid and unfair for the player who worked hard to develop this wealth for many reasons (and one of those reasons is to make it harder for other players to sanction him!).. What I liked about this game was that there is some strategy involved but now you want to turn it into a Bang Bang game?
big bang? it a wargame i want ww3 a total genocide
I think a combination of your level and your army of some sort would be good. This way it's how strong, (i.e. how high up your level and also how big and powerful is your army), you are that dictates the bounty. In the real world, if you're going to hit someone strong, you are going to want a big bounty. If you're going to kick around pre-schoolers for lollipops, you're going to get chump change...
Income is a poor determining factor for bounty price. It limits our sanctions and encourages people to use auto-clickers to collect, (which puts the rest of us that just log on normally), at a distinct disadvantage.
Mach
I vote yes,i need more action(i seel all my defens,to have more action)...end 1 more thing...kent by posibile 2 more top ...(rank)..best atack...end best defens....end plz take out time limit for next hit.....love you all!!!
of course , bounty price should be based on income ,just sayin' ;)
James, Perhaps I should clarify..I would vote for level, with all other factors unchanged. If Joel gets his changes, then not.Quote:
Originally Posted by james henderson
I do agree with Joel(!) on the damage issue, The imperative function of sanctions must be punishment,period. There should be absolutely no benefit whatsoever, or there will be abuses.
If a 'flat-rate' system is not used, Then a horrifically detrimental set-up with units lost,or looted, cash stolen,health gone and maybe even xp lost.
If the system is set properly, no one will WANT to be sanctioned.
As it should be.....
I also think we should be able to kill allies, and claim own sanctions.
i really hope,that the devs will treat this issue,like how it is in real life.........where the price on subject gets higher depending on his position in society........and so, a bit on level but more on productivity, thats wealth......thank u and more power WZ ;)
Make it Interesting!!! keep us guess a bit. . how about this formula.
Unit Price equals Sanction Price - all the money spend on units equals your sanction price. This way people who depend highly on gifted units go for cheap, and players who capitilize on money like capitalists have nice high prices :)
i will say one thing , i love warzone we just need a lot more players , sanctions i can say this in warzone it just not work, i can tell you abouth other game i play and sanctions is a non stop bussiness there , every min 1 sure
dev in af give no more news many months now but players still love the sanctions there
if you on sanctions , you die sure , if you dead all your income stop and you lost a lot exp till you come back on line , strange thing in armed forces , if you stay dead more then 2 hours you recieve full health , full ammo and full energy , thats why sanctions works there non stop , players want to be sanctioned just saying why armed forces have the most sanctions game of all i real love warzone maybe warzone must take the best from other games and put it in warzone just saying have fun all
Live sanction board is great, congrats on a great improvement ......We will fully utilize it once our piggish nature with boss cash is satiated.
Expect it...
Yeah man, and the prices are puuurrrrrrrrrrrrfect :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dhurti Panty
fixed to the players level